QHY vs. IBHG
QHY (WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - QHY tracks the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index while IBHG tracks the Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QHY returned 8.10%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for IBHG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.
Performance
QHY vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHY achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 0.96% return.
QHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
IBHG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHY vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 1.46% | 9.61% | 5.92% | 10.12% | -11.81% | 0.99% |
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 0.96% | 6.90% | 7.42% | 11.27% | -8.88% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHY and IBHG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QHY and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHY vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank
QHY
IBHG
QHY vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QHY | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 6.38 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 23.30 | -11.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHY | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.20 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.56 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
QHY vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHY and IBHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHY | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -13.85% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -0.73% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | -3.39% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.22% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -2.67% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.20% | +0.41% |
Volatility
QHY vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.58%. This indicates that QHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHY | IBHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 0.58% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 1.53% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 2.11% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 6.37% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 6.37% | +1.83% |
QHY vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHY vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison
QHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than IBHG's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF | 6.08% | 6.33% | 7.02% | 6.66% | 5.62% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 6.26% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHY and IBHG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QHY has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to IBHG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHY dropped -22.74% vs IBHG's -13.85%.
On 3-year performance, QHY leads with 8.10% vs 7.37% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QHY has performed better with a 8.10% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QHY.
QHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 6.08% for IBHG.
QHY tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QHY and 0.35% for IBHG.
IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QHY and IBHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer