QHY vs. FAAR
QHY (WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. QHY is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, QHY returned 4.89%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for FAAR. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
QHY vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHY achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QHY having a 4.89% annualized return and FAAR not far behind at 4.79%.
QHY
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.89%
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
QHY vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 1.56% | 9.61% | 5.92% | 10.12% | -11.81% | 4.12% | 5.99% | 15.65% | -0.06% | 5.66% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | 12.34% | 8.60% | -1.28% | -9.17% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHY and FAAR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016 | 0.03 |
The correlation between QHY and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.04 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHY vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
QHY
FAAR
QHY vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QHY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 4.75 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 14.70 | -3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QHY vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHY and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -18.03% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -5.68% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | -11.54% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -18.03% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | -18.03% | -4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -5.43% | +5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -7.82% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 1.89% | -1.28% |
Volatility
QHY vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) is 0.94%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that QHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 2.47% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 9.68% | -6.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 13.37% | -9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.58% | 12.95% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 11.53% | -3.33% |
QHY vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHY vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
QHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% | 0.00% |
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 6.25% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHY and FAAR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to QHY (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHY dropped -22.74% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 10-year performance, QHY leads with 4.89% vs 4.79% for FAAR. On fees, QHY is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QHY has performed better with a 4.89% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QHY is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 6.25% for QHY.
QHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QHY and 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QHY and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer