QHY vs. DADS
QHY (WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. QHY is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
QHY vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHY achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.37% return.
QHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
DADS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHY vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 1.46% | 3.43% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.37% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHY and DADS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHY vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
QHY
DADS
QHY vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
QHY vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHY and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -17.07% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -2.77% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -7.63% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility
QHY vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHY | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 17.58% | -13.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 17.58% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 17.58% | -9.38% |
QHY vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHY vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
QHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 6.26% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHY and DADS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QHY is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QHY is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
QHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QHY and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for QHY and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer