QHFRX vs. QLFRX
QHFRX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6) and QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - QHFRX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR, while QLFRX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QHFRX charges 6.59%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for QLFRX.
Performance
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHFRX achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly higher than QLFRX's -2.83% return.
QHFRX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFRX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHFRX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 | -1.44% | 5.06% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | -2.83% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHFRX and QLFRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 (QHFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHFRX drawdown since its inception was -13.76%, smaller than the maximum QLFRX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFRX and QLFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHFRX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.76% | -14.53% | +0.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -4.02% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -5.50% | +0.52% |
Volatility
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHFRX | QLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 16.96% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.96% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.96% | +0.47% |
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHFRX has a 6.59% expense ratio, which is higher than QLFRX's 6.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHFRX vs. QLFRX - Dividend Comparison
QHFRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QHFRX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.23% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, QHFRX and QLFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QHFRX and QLFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer