QHFIX vs. ALLW
QHFIX (AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I) and ALLW (SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF) are both funds - QHFIX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR, while ALLW is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QHFIX charges 6.69%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ALLW.
Performance
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHFIX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than ALLW's 9.20% return.
QHFIX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALLW
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 3.72% | 4.97% |
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 9.20% | 0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHFIX and ALLW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHFIX vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank
QHFIX
ALLW
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I (QHFIX) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHFIX | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.62 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHFIX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHFIX and ALLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHFIX | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.85% | -8.78% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.79% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -1.20% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.70% | — |
Volatility
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHFIX | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 10.52% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 12.54% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 12.54% | +3.88% |
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHFIX has a 6.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHFIX vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison
QHFIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 4.28% | 4.67% |
QHFIX AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHFIX and ALLW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QHFIX and ALLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer