QHDG vs. RFLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QHDG (Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF) and RFLR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QHDG returned 11.61% vs 25.97% for RFLR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QHDG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RFLR.

Performance

QHDG vs. RFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QHDG achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than RFLR's 7.99% return.

QHDG

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 11.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RFLR

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 8.36%
• 1Y: 25.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QHDG vs. RFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QHDG Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF	1.03%	12.13%	7.66%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	7.99%	11.81%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QHDG and RFLR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.57

The correlation between QHDG and RFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

QHDG vs. RFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QHDG	RFLR
Technology	53.8%	16.3%
Communication Services	15.8%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	2.5%
Healthcare	4.2%	15.4%
Industrials	2.8%	14.7%
Utilities	1.4%	2.5%
Basic Materials	1.1%	4.3%
Energy	0.6%	6.2%
Financial Services	0.2%	17.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	6.3%

Return for Risk

QHDG vs. RFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QHDG

QHDG Risk / Return Rank: 37
QHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
QHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
QHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

RFLR

RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 72
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QHDG vs. RFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QHDG	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.13	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.06	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.38	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	4.51	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.69	15.89	-10.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QHDG vs. RFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the RFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QHDG and RFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QHDG	RFLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	2.13	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.09	-0.20

Drawdowns

QHDG vs. RFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, roughly equal to the maximum RFLR drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHDG and RFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QHDG	RFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.29%	-15.48%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-5.79%	-1.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-1.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-3.85%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.64%	+0.41%

Volatility

QHDG vs. RFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) is 0.26%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that QHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QHDG	RFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.26%	3.70%	-3.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.54%	8.33%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	12.28%	-3.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.44%	12.19%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.44%	12.19%	+0.25%

QHDG vs. RFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QHDG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than RFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

QHDG vs. RFLR - Dividend Comparison

QHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QHDG Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
RFLR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF	0.62%	0.67%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QHDG and RFLR in my portfolio?

QHDG and RFLR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QHDG or RFLR?

RFLR has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to QHDG (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHDG dropped -15.29% vs RFLR's -15.48%.

Which ETF is better, QHDG or RFLR?

On 1-year performance, RFLR leads with 25.97% vs 11.61% for QHDG. On fees, QHDG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QHDG has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QHDG or RFLR?

Over the 1-year period, RFLR has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QHDG or RFLR?

QHDG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QHDG or RFLR?

RFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for QHDG.

What is the main difference between QHDG and RFLR?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QHDG and 0.89% for RFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.