QGRO vs. FUSI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and FUSI (American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while FUSI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by American Century. QGRO is passively managed, while FUSI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QGRO returned 21.29%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for FUSI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FUSI.

Performance

QGRO vs. FUSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than FUSI's 2.39% return.

QGRO

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 2.19%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 10.81%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 12.22%
• 10Y*: —

FUSI

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRO vs. FUSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF	2.19%	15.18%	31.42%	23.92%
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF	2.39%	4.85%	6.19%	5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRO and FUSI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023	0.09

The correlation between QGRO and FUSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QGRO vs. FUSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRO

QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 20
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FUSI

FUSI Risk / Return Rank: 98
FUSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FUSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FUSI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FUSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FUSI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRO vs. FUSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QGRO	FUSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	6.05	-5.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	9.35	-8.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	2.99	-1.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	12.25	-11.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.69	91.02	-88.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QGRO vs. FUSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the FUSI Sharpe Ratio of 6.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRO and FUSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QGRO	FUSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	6.05	-5.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	5.57	-4.91

Drawdowns

QGRO vs. FUSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, which is greater than FUSI's maximum drawdown of -0.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and FUSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGRO	FUSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.56%	-0.70%	-31.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-0.45%	-13.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.82%	-0.70%	-23.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.03%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-0.04%	-7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	0.06%	+3.97%

Volatility

QGRO vs. FUSI - Volatility Comparison

American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) at 0.25%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGRO	FUSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	0.25%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	0.61%	+11.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.33%	0.90%	+14.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	1.09%	+19.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.93%	1.09%	+21.84%

QGRO vs. FUSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FUSI's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

QGRO vs. FUSI - Dividend Comparison

QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than FUSI's 4.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FUSI American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF	4.85%	5.28%	5.98%	4.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF	0.19%	0.25%	0.25%	0.41%	0.46%	0.31%	0.22%	0.38%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QGRO and FUSI in my portfolio?

QGRO and FUSI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QGRO or FUSI?

QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FUSI (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs FUSI's -0.70%.

Which ETF is better, QGRO or FUSI?

On 3-year performance, QGRO leads with 21.29% vs 5.97% for FUSI. On fees, FUSI is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FUSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QGRO or FUSI?

Over the 3-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 21.29% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QGRO or FUSI?

FUSI is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QGRO or FUSI?

FUSI has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.

What is the main difference between QGRO and FUSI?

QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FUSI is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.28% for FUSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.05 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.