QGMIX vs. EBSAX
QGMIX (AQR Macro Opportunities Fund) and EBSAX (Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares) are both Macro Trading funds. Over the past 5 years, QGMIX returned 4.62%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for EBSAX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QGMIX charges 1.20%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for EBSAX.
Performance
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGMIX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly lower than EBSAX's 9.74% return.
QGMIX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
EBSAX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGMIX AQR Macro Opportunities Fund | 1.84% | 4.00% | -0.95% | 0.01% | 29.30% | -4.54% | 1.49% |
EBSAX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares | 9.74% | -1.34% | 11.28% | -2.11% | 30.56% | 8.90% | 4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGMIX and EBSAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGMIX vs. EBSAX — Risk / Return Rank
QGMIX
EBSAX
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) and Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGMIX | EBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.12 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 0.95 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.48 | 2.08 | -0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGMIX | EBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 0.68 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.89 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.13 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGMIX drawdown since its inception was -13.48%, which is greater than EBSAX's maximum drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGMIX and EBSAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGMIX | EBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.48% | -11.15% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.01% | -5.83% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -10.26% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.48% | -11.15% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -0.78% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -3.15% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.67% | -0.71% |
Volatility
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Macro Opportunities Fund (QGMIX) is 1.58%, while Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares (EBSAX) has a volatility of 1.98%. This indicates that QGMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGMIX | EBSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.98% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.22% | 5.97% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.97% | 8.17% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 9.59% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.37% | 9.47% | -1.10% |
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGMIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EBSAX's 2.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGMIX vs. EBSAX - Dividend Comparison
QGMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than EBSAX's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBSAX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class A Shares | 2.74% | 3.00% | 2.59% | 1.45% | 15.15% | 7.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGMIX AQR Macro Opportunities Fund | 1.41% | 1.44% | 1.92% | 10.07% | 7.48% | 1.49% | 0.96% | 0.05% | 3.92% | 0.04% | 6.05% | 5.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGMIX and EBSAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EBSAX has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to QGMIX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGMIX dropped -13.48% vs EBSAX's -11.15%.
EBSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGMIX and EBSAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer