PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFVOX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFVOX achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 27.01% return.


QFVOX

1D
0.47%
1M
5.36%
YTD
19.45%
6M
24.45%
1Y
39.72%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
9.83%

FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
19.45%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%2.65%4.73%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QFVOX and FISZX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.66

The correlation between QFVOX and FISZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFVOX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QFVOXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.89

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

11.38

+1.34

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFVOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFVOX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFVOXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.21

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.50

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.65

-0.25

Drawdowns

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFVOX drawdown since its inception was -70.51%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFVOX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFVOXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.51%

-39.92%

-30.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.02%

-14.48%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-14.63%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.90%

-39.92%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.30%

-12.37%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.66%

-0.55%

Volatility

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) is 4.84%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that QFVOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFVOXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

7.78%

-2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

16.22%

-3.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

18.93%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.49%

17.84%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

18.27%

-1.45%

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFVOX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFVOX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

QFVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.74%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFVOX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to QFVOX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFVOX dropped -70.51% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFVOX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer