QFITX vs. QMLFX
QFITX (Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both mutual funds - QFITX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while QMLFX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QFITX returned -1.30%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for QMLFX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QFITX charges 1.56%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.
Performance
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QFITX achieves a -4.59% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 21.38% return.
QFITX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -4.59%
- 6M
- -4.52%
- 1Y
- -6.65%
- 3Y*
- -6.12%
- 5Y*
- -1.30%
- 10Y*
- —
QMLFX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 6.68%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 6M
- 18.19%
- 1Y
- 38.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund | -4.59% | -7.64% | -1.03% | -6.54% | -22.87% | 36.77% | 10.36% | 2.31% |
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund | 21.38% | 0.97% | 11.05% | 15.04% | -23.59% | 13.22% | 37.81% | 12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFITX and QMLFX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2019 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, QFITX and QMLFX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFITX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank
QFITX
QMLFX
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFITX | QMLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.32 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 4.13 | -4.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 11.64 | -13.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFITX drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, roughly equal to the maximum QMLFX drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFITX and QMLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFITX | QMLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -36.59% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -10.07% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.64% | -27.21% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -34.07% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.67% | 0.00% | -37.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -12.49% | -6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 3.56% | +0.62% |
Volatility
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX) is 1.10%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 11.85%. This indicates that QFITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFITX | QMLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 11.85% | -10.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 17.84% | -13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.45% | 23.04% | -17.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 20.54% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 21.24% | -1.04% |
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFITX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFITX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison
QFITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, more than QMLFX's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 16.08% | 12.72% | 3.70% | 0.08% | 0.15% | 29.15% | 2.12% | 4.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund | 1.13% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 26.84% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 15.63% | 12.15% | 2.22% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFITX and QMLFX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QMLFX has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to QFITX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFITX dropped -38.03% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.
QMLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QFITX and QMLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer