QEW vs. SPLV
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEW is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
QEW vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
QEW vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 21.49% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | -2.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and SPLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
QEW
SPLV
QEW vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QEW | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 9.75 | 0.68 | +9.07 |
Drawdowns
QEW vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -36.26% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -6.91% | +6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -3.55% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility
QEW vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 9.78% | +6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 12.45% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 15.36% | +0.42% |
QEW vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QEW and SPLV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QEW vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEW and SPLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW and SPLV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.
QEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPLV is S&P 500. QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index.
Find the right allocation for QEW and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer