QEW vs. QYLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QEW tracks the Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index while QYLG tracks the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QEW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

QEW vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QEW

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 10.55%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 14.75%
• 6M: 14.78%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 21.40%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEW vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	21.49%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QEW and QYLG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.88

Return for Risk

QEW vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 81
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEW vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEW	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.75	0.83	+8.92

Drawdowns

QEW vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEW	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-29.98%	+25.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.05%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.57%	-6.42%	+5.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QEW	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	12.17%	+3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.78%	17.98%	-2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.78%	17.93%	-2.15%

QEW vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEW vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.08%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEW and QYLG in my portfolio?

QEW and QYLG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QEW or QYLG?

On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QEW or QYLG?

QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QEW or QYLG?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.08%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.

What is the main difference between QEW and QYLG?

QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 0.60% for QYLG.