PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEW vs. QLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEW vs. QLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QEW

1D
-2.01%
1M
1.99%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLDY

1D
-3.02%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
12.52%
6M
10.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEW vs. QLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QEW and QLDY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEW vs. QLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QEW vs. QLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEW vs. QLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -5.87%, smaller than the maximum QLDY drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and QLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEWQLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-17.44%

+11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-5.63%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-4.23%

+3.12%

Volatility

QEW vs. QLDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEWQLDYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

21.34%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.39%

21.34%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.39%

21.34%

-0.95%

QEW vs. QLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QLDY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEW vs. QLDY - Dividend Comparison

QEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QLDY's 24.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QEW and QLDY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 24.21%, compared with 0.11% for QEW.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QEW and 1.04% for QLDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEW and QLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer