PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEW vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEW vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QEW

1D
-0.11%
1M
10.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDMO

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.74%
6M
12.22%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEW vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QEW and IDMO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEW vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEW

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEW vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QEW vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QEWIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.75

0.45

+9.30

Drawdowns

QEW vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEWIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-39.38%

+35.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-2.31%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-9.76%

+9.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

Volatility

QEW vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEWIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

16.89%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

17.84%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

18.12%

-2.34%

QEW vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QEW and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QEW vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.53%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
QEW
Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEW and IDMO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QEW and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.

QEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IDMO is Momentum. QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEW and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer