QEW vs. IDMO
QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEW is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
QEW vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QEW
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 26.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
QEW vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 17.75% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEW and IDMO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEW vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
QEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDMO
QEW vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QEW | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QEW vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEW drawdown since its inception was -5.87%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEW and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEW | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -39.38% | +33.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -2.67% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.11% | -9.73% | +8.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility
QEW vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEW | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 18.13% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 18.09% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 17.95% | +2.44% |
QEW vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QEW and IDMO have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QEW vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
QEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than IDMO's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.64% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEW and IDMO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW and IDMO have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.11% for QEW.
QEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IDMO is Momentum. QEW tracks Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index.
Find the right allocation for QEW and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer