QEVOX vs. QMLFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QEVOX (Quantified Evolution Plus Fund) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds from Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QEVOX returned 9.32%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QMLFX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QEVOX charges 1.56%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.

Performance

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEVOX achieves a 54.73% return, which is significantly higher than QMLFX's 18.90% return.

QEVOX

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 54.73%
• 6M: 60.74%
• 1Y: 79.04%
• 3Y*: 23.49%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: —

QMLFX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 9.25%
• YTD: 18.90%
• 6M: 16.97%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QEVOX Quantified Evolution Plus Fund	54.73%	8.67%	14.79%	1.22%	-24.02%	14.49%	-1.82%	-1.96%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	18.90%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	13.22%	37.81%	15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QEVOX and QMLFX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2019	0.43

The correlation between QEVOX and QMLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QEVOX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEVOX

QEVOX Risk / Return Rank: 90
QEVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
QEVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QEVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
QEVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QEVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QEVOX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	1.94	+1.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	2.52	+1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.33	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.30	3.91	+2.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.14	11.54	+13.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEVOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEVOX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEVOX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25	1.94	+1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.03	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.42	-0.06

Drawdowns

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEVOX drawdown since its inception was -28.47%, smaller than the maximum QMLFX drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEVOX and QMLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEVOX	QMLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.47%	-36.59%	+8.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.69%	-10.07%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.21%	-27.21%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.40%	-36.59%	+9.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.33%	0.00%	-9.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-12.54%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	3.41%	-0.23%

Volatility

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Evolution Plus Fund (QEVOX) is 6.38%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that QEVOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEVOX	QMLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	7.62%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.62%	14.34%	+7.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.86%	20.52%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	20.23%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	20.97%	+0.76%

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEVOX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

QEVOX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

QEVOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.87%, more than QMLFX's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QEVOX Quantified Evolution Plus Fund	42.87%	66.34%	10.32%	24.53%	0.07%	13.55%	2.29%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.15%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QEVOX and QMLFX in my portfolio?

QEVOX and QMLFX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QEVOX or QMLFX?

QMLFX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to QEVOX (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEVOX dropped -28.47% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QEVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.