QETH vs. SOEZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QETH (Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.

Performance

QETH vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly higher than SOEZ's -43.12% return.

QETH

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -25.22%
• YTD: -40.24%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOEZ

• 1D: -3.99%
• 1M: -20.02%
• YTD: -43.12%
• 6M: -49.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QETH vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF	-40.24%	-5.50%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	-43.12%	-11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QETH and SOEZ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

QETH vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QETH

QETH Risk / Return Rank: 5
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QETH vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QETH	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QETH	SOEZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	-1.10	+0.68

Drawdowns

QETH vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than SOEZ's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and SOEZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QETH	SOEZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.07%	-52.20%	-11.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.39%	-52.20%	-11.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.76%	-30.97%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QETH	SOEZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.40%	68.82%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.22%	68.82%	+3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.22%	68.82%	+3.40%

QETH vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QETH vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison

QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.

Position	TTM
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF	0.00%
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QETH and SOEZ in my portfolio?

QETH and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QETH or SOEZ?

On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QETH or SOEZ?

SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QETH or SOEZ?

SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.

What is the main difference between QETH and SOEZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.19% for SOEZ.