QETH vs. PPA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QETH (Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Invesco, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. QETH is actively managed, while PPA is passively managed. Over the past year, QETH returned -49.13% vs 25.42% for PPA. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.

Performance

QETH vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -36.96% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 17.30% return.

QETH

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 10.30%
• 6M: -18.57%
• YTD: -36.96%
• 1Y: -49.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.83%

PPA

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: 1.36%
• 6M: 4.24%
• YTD: 17.30%
• 1Y: 25.42%
• 3Y*: 30.20%
• 5Y*: 20.83%
• 10Y*: 17.75%
• ALL TIME*: 13.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	$32.93M	$30.54M	$34.86M
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF	$441.76K	$366.32K	$431.82K

QETH vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF	-36.96%	-11.44%	-5.03%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	17.30%	37.15%	8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QETH and PPA is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

QETH vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QETH

QETH Risk / Return Rank: 3
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 43
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QETH vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QETH	PPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	1.21	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	1.82	-2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.21	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	1.86	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	4.73	-5.81

QETH vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QETH and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QETH vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -67.90%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and PPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QETH	PPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.90%	-57.37%	-10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.90%	-13.71%	-54.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-1.00%	-60.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.37%	-9.16%	-26.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.70%	5.38%	+40.32%

Volatility

QETH vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) at 7.41%. This indicates that QETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QETH	PPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.18%	7.41%	+3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.43%	17.20%	+26.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.86%	21.12%	+45.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.09%	18.81%	+52.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.09%	20.83%	+50.26%

QETH vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QETH vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.35%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QETH and PPA in my portfolio?

QETH and PPA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QETH or PPA?

QETH has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to PPA (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -67.90% vs PPA's -57.37%.

Which ETF is better, QETH or PPA?

On 1-year performance, PPA leads with 25.42% vs -49.13% for QETH. On fees, QETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PPA has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QETH or PPA?

Over the 1-year period, PPA has performed better with a 25.42% return vs -49.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QETH or PPA?

QETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QETH or PPA?

PPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.

What is the main difference between QETH and PPA?

QETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.58% for PPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.