QETH vs. IBIC
QETH (Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Invesco, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. QETH is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, QETH returned -32.58% vs 4.49% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. QETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
QETH vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.34% return.
QETH
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -25.22%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.56%
- 1Y
- -32.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QETH vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.44% | -3.58% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.34% | 4.96% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between QETH and IBIC is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QETH vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
QETH
IBIC
QETH vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QETH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 2.22 | -1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 17.09 | -17.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 66.52 | -67.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QETH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 4.99 | -5.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 3.48 | -3.90 |
Drawdowns
QETH vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QETH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.07% | -0.90% | -63.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -0.26% | -63.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.39% | -0.16% | -63.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.76% | -0.10% | -32.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.96% | 0.07% | +37.89% |
Volatility
QETH vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.32%. This indicates that QETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QETH | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 0.32% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.42% | 0.67% | +44.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.40% | 0.90% | +67.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.22% | 1.58% | +70.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.22% | 1.58% | +70.64% |
QETH vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QETH vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QETH and IBIC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QETH has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to IBIC (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -64.07% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, IBIC leads with 4.49% vs -32.58% for QETH. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIC has performed better with a 4.49% return vs -32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.
QETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QETH and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer