PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QETH vs. ETHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QETH vs. ETHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QETH having a -40.24% return and ETHW slightly lower at -40.29%.


QETH

1D
-1.34%
1M
-25.22%
YTD
-40.24%
6M
-43.56%
1Y
-32.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ETHW

1D
-1.40%
1M
-25.25%
YTD
-40.29%
6M
-43.56%
1Y
-32.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QETH vs. ETHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QETH
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
-40.24%-11.44%-3.58%
ETHW
Bitwise Ethereum ETF
-40.29%-11.26%-3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QETH and ETHW is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

1.00

The correlation between QETH and ETHW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QETH vs. ETHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QETH
QETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHW
ETHW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHW Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QETH vs. ETHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QETHETHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.96

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.52

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

-0.86

0.00

QETH vs. ETHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is comparable to the ETHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QETH and ETHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QETHETHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

-0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.42

0.00

Drawdowns

QETH vs. ETHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHW drawdown of -64.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and ETHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QETHETHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.07%

-64.04%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-63.39%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.39%

-63.39%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.76%

-32.72%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.96%

37.95%

+0.01%

Volatility

QETH vs. ETHW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) have volatilities of 9.72% and 9.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QETHETHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

9.86%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.42%

45.32%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.40%

68.23%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.22%

72.06%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.22%

72.06%

+0.16%

QETH vs. ETHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHW's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QETH vs. ETHW - Dividend Comparison

Neither QETH nor ETHW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QETH and ETHW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ETHW has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to QETH (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -64.07% vs ETHW's -64.04%.

On 1-year performance, ETHW leads with -32.55% vs -32.58% for QETH. On fees, ETHW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ETHW has performed better with a -32.55% return vs -32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETHW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QETH.

QETH and ETHW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.20% for ETHW.

QETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.48 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QETH and ETHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer