QETH vs. AETH
QETH (Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF) and AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QETH returned -32.58% vs -16.19% for AETH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AETH.
Performance
QETH vs. AETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than AETH's -9.77% return.
QETH
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -25.22%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.56%
- 1Y
- -32.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AETH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -15.31%
- 1Y
- -16.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QETH vs. AETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.44% | -3.58% |
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -9.77% | -0.11% | -5.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QETH and AETH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between QETH and AETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QETH vs. AETH — Risk / Return Rank
QETH
AETH
QETH vs. AETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QETH | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | -0.37 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.52 | -0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QETH | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | -0.36 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.37 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
QETH vs. AETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than AETH's maximum drawdown of -47.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and AETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QETH | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.07% | -47.78% | -16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -43.98% | -19.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.39% | -43.84% | -19.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.76% | -24.68% | -8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.96% | 30.99% | +6.97% |
Volatility
QETH vs. AETH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) at 4.02%. This indicates that QETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QETH | AETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 4.02% | +5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.42% | 27.18% | +18.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.40% | 44.88% | +23.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.22% | 54.64% | +17.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.22% | 54.64% | +17.58% |
QETH vs. AETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AETH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
QETH vs. AETH - Dividend Comparison
QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.67% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QETH and AETH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QETH has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to AETH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -64.07% vs AETH's -47.78%.
On 1-year performance, AETH leads with -16.19% vs -32.58% for QETH. On fees, QETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AETH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AETH has performed better with a -16.19% return vs -32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AETH.
AETH has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.90% for AETH.
AETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QETH and AETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer