QDX.TO vs. THE.TO
QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) and THE.TO (TD International Equity CAD Hedged Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - QDX.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index while THE.TO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDX.TO returned 11.47%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for THE.TO. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QDX.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for THE.TO.
Performance
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDX.TO achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than THE.TO's 13.00% return.
QDX.TO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.89%
THE.TO
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$357.51K | CA$296.06K | CA$600.37K | |
| CA$226.21K | CA$221.25K | CA$208.47K |
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 14.10% | 25.29% | 12.93% | 13.65% | -8.61% | 11.24% | 5.06% | 15.27% | -8.78% |
THE.TO TD International Equity CAD Hedged Index ETF | 13.00% | 21.73% | 12.55% | 18.49% | -7.02% | 16.77% | 1.71% | 20.59% | -10.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDX.TO and THE.TO is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, QDX.TO and THE.TO have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Industrials
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Technology
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Healthcare
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Consumer Cyclical
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Consumer Defensive
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Basic Materials
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Communication Services
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Utilities
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Energy
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Real Estate
QDX.TO
THE.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QDX.TO
THE.TO
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and TD International Equity CAD Hedged Index ETF (THE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDX.TO | THE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.67 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 10.33 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, smaller than the maximum THE.TO drawdown of -32.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDX.TO and THE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDX.TO | THE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.08% | -32.08% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -9.47% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -14.69% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -15.55% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.59% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -3.68% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.44% | +0.39% |
Volatility
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to TD International Equity CAD Hedged Index ETF (THE.TO) at 3.31%. This indicates that QDX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDX.TO | THE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.31% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 10.75% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.89% | 12.80% | +2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 14.20% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 17.08% | -1.63% |
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDX.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than THE.TO's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDX.TO vs. THE.TO - Dividend Comparison
QDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, which matches THE.TO's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.61% | 2.73% | 2.25% | 1.91% | 2.76% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THE.TO TD International Equity CAD Hedged Index ETF | 2.33% | 2.57% | 2.73% | 2.65% | 3.46% | 2.20% | 2.47% | 2.52% | 3.52% | 2.87% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDX.TO and THE.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for THE.TO.
QDX.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index, while THE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Hedged to CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for QDX.TO and 0.19% for THE.TO.
Find the right allocation for QDX.TO and THE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer