QDX.TO vs. PID.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QDX.TO (Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF) and PID.TO (Purpose International Dividend Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. QDX.TO is passively managed, while PID.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDX.TO returned 11.47%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for PID.TO. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QDX.TO charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PID.TO.

Performance

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDX.TO achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than PID.TO's 17.77% return.

QDX.TO

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: 8.38%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 1Y: 26.93%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.89%

PID.TO

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.57%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 17.77%
• 1Y: 35.02%
• 3Y*: 22.89%
• 5Y*: 15.17%
• 10Y*: 10.73%
• ALL TIME*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	CA$137.31K	CA$154.29K	CA$193.57K
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF	CA$357.51K	CA$296.06K	CA$600.37K

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF	14.10%	25.29%	12.93%	13.65%	-8.61%	11.24%	5.06%	15.27%	-8.78%
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	17.77%	33.43%	13.85%	15.75%	-2.67%	7.76%	-3.24%	14.04%	-1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between QDX.TO and PID.TO is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018	0.53

Over the past year, QDX.TO and PID.TO have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDX.TO	PID.TO
Financial Services	24.6%	39.7%
Industrials	19.0%	8.1%
Technology	12.4%	2.3%
Healthcare	10.4%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	5.4%
Basic Materials	5.8%	8.3%
Communication Services	4.3%	5.6%
Utilities	3.7%	6.3%
Energy	3.4%	4.8%
Real Estate	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDX.TO

QDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PID.TO

PID.TO Risk / Return Rank: 87
PID.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PID.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PID.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PID.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PID.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) and Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDX.TO	PID.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.39	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	3.28	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.12	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	12.05	-2.77

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the PID.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDX.TO and PID.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.08%, roughly equal to the maximum PID.TO drawdown of -27.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDX.TO and PID.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDX.TO	PID.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.08%	-27.27%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.88%	-11.09%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.25%	-12.35%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	-20.07%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.86%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-4.11%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.86%	-0.03%

Volatility

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX.TO) is 4.13%, while Purpose International Dividend Fund (PID.TO) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that QDX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PID.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDX.TO	PID.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.13%	4.45%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	12.23%	+0.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.89%	14.48%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	12.51%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.45%	13.80%	+1.65%

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDX.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than PID.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDX.TO vs. PID.TO - Dividend Comparison

QDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than PID.TO's 2.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PID.TO Purpose International Dividend Fund	2.69%	3.12%	4.02%	4.39%	4.86%	4.50%	4.64%	4.28%	4.67%	3.53%	3.49%	2.10%
QDX.TO Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF	2.34%	2.51%	2.48%	2.61%	2.73%	2.25%	1.91%	2.76%	3.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDX.TO and PID.TO in my portfolio?

QDX.TO and PID.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QDX.TO or PID.TO?

On fees, QDX.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDX.TO or PID.TO?

QDX.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PID.TO.

What is the main difference between QDX.TO and PID.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for QDX.TO and 0.65% for PID.TO.