PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVX.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QDVX.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
4.78%
6M
6.26%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

CEMT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
9.41%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVX.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
4.78%11.35%10.70%15.30%0.75%19.00%-10.08%26.55%-6.30%2.31%
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%17.53%5.08%14.19%-18.24%19.63%1.61%28.81%-13.99%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVX.DE and CEMT.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2017

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between QDVX.DE and CEMT.DE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVX.DE
QDVX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QDVX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMT.DE
CEMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVX.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVX.DECEMT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.10

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

4.03

-1.10

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the CEMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVX.DE and CEMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVX.DECEMT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.77

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.28

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.37

+0.13

Drawdowns

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVX.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMT.DE drawdown of -37.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVX.DE and CEMT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVX.DECEMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-37.66%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-4.26%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-14.36%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

-29.23%

+14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-0.39%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-7.08%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.16%

+1.47%

Volatility

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (QDVX.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that QDVX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVX.DECEMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

0.00%

+3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

0.00%

+8.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

6.11%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

14.61%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

16.11%

-0.76%

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVX.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMT.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVX.DE vs. CEMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, while CEMT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEMT.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVX.DE
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.21%3.02%3.11%3.58%4.25%4.50%3.25%4.45%5.19%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVX.DE and CEMT.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CEMT.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEMT.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QDVX.DE.

QDVX.DE tracks MSCI Europe High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QDVX.DE and 0.25% for CEMT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVX.DE and CEMT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer