PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist (QDVW.DE) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDVW.DE is traded in EUR, while LDGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDGL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


QDVW.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.46%
6M
16.01%
YTD
18.29%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*

LDGL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.05%
6M
13.31%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDVW.DE and LDGL.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVW.DE
QDVW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QDVW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LDGL.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist (QDVW.DE) and L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDVW.DELDGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.55

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVW.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.56%, which is greater than LDGL.L's maximum drawdown of -7.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVW.DE and LDGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVW.DELDGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.56%

-7.52%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.03%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-1.64%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

Volatility

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVW.DELDGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

13.39%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

13.39%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

13.39%

+1.00%

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVW.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than LDGL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVW.DE vs. LDGL.L - Dividend Comparison

QDVW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than LDGL.L's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDGL.L
L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing
1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.10%2.37%2.52%2.85%3.04%2.63%3.05%3.03%3.26%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVW.DE and LDGL.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QDVW.DE.

QDVW.DE tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index USD, while LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QDVW.DE and 0.29% for LDGL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVW.DE and LDGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer