QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE
QDVS.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF) and EUNM.DE (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - QDVS.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels while EUNM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVS.DE returned 5.01%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for EUNM.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EUNM.DE.
Performance
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVS.DE achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than EUNM.DE's 27.21% return.
QDVS.DE
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNM.DE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 27.83%
- 1Y
- 48.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVS.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF | 17.24% | 16.78% | 11.26% | -2.12% | -12.39% | 6.97% | 6.67% | 19.37% | -6.54% | 18.05% |
EUNM.DE iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 27.21% | 19.18% | 14.09% | 5.71% | -14.47% | 4.68% | 6.84% | 20.91% | -10.84% | 19.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVS.DE and EUNM.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QDVS.DE and EUNM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVS.DE
EUNM.DE
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVS.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.50 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.50 | 4.72 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | 17.07 | -4.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVS.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.78 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.50 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and EUNM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVS.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.51% | -35.91% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -10.46% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.83% | -19.01% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | -23.62% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -2.61% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -10.55% | +1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.90% | -0.08% |
Volatility
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) is 6.00%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that QDVS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVS.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 7.30% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 14.98% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 17.80% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 16.70% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 18.19% | +0.49% |
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVS.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVS.DE nor EUNM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QDVS.DE and EUNM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EUNM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QDVS.DE.
QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QDVS.DE and 0.18% for EUNM.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVS.DE and EUNM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer