PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EUNI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDVS.DE having a 17.24% return and EUNI.DE slightly lower at 16.80%.


QDVS.DE

1D
-1.71%
1M
0.53%
YTD
17.24%
6M
17.96%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*

EUNI.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
16.80%
6M
15.58%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
13.85%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVS.DE
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
17.24%16.78%11.26%-2.12%-12.39%6.97%6.67%19.37%-6.54%18.05%
EUNI.DE
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF
16.80%6.21%8.18%19.10%-13.60%28.84%7.23%14.66%-16.19%18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVS.DE and EUNI.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016

0.80

The correlation between QDVS.DE and EUNI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVS.DE
QDVS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNI.DE
EUNI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EUNI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EUNI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVS.DEEUNI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.23

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

10.53

+2.14

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the EUNI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVS.DE and EUNI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVS.DEEUNI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.56

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.51

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Drawdowns

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, smaller than the maximum EUNI.DE drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and EUNI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVS.DEEUNI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.51%

-41.89%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-7.95%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.83%

-21.15%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-21.15%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-2.54%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-10.57%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

2.44%

+0.38%

Volatility

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) is 6.00%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (EUNI.DE) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that QDVS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVS.DEEUNI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

6.91%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

14.01%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

16.45%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

15.21%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

16.84%

+1.84%

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNI.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVS.DE vs. EUNI.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUNI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNI.DE
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.81%1.83%1.74%2.11%2.47%1.23%1.77%2.02%2.14%1.45%2.00%0.85%
QDVS.DE
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVS.DE and EUNI.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EUNI.DE.

QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while EUNI.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QDVS.DE and 0.74% for EUNI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVS.DE and EUNI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer