PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVS.DE achieves a 17.24% return, which is significantly lower than AXQE.DE's 37.94% return.


QDVS.DE

1D
-1.71%
1M
0.53%
YTD
17.24%
6M
17.96%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*

AXQE.DE

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.62%
YTD
37.94%
6M
41.71%
1Y
67.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDVS.DE and AXQE.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.77

The correlation between QDVS.DE and AXQE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVS.DE
QDVS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AXQE.DE
AXQE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AXQE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXQE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXQE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AXQE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXQE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) and AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVS.DEAXQE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.48

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

14.04

-1.37

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the AXQE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVS.DE and AXQE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVS.DEAXQE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.10

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.81

-1.41

Drawdowns

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVS.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.51%, which is greater than AXQE.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVS.DE and AXQE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVS.DEAXQE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.51%

-19.63%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-19.63%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-2.54%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-2.70%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

4.87%

-2.05%

Volatility

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF (QDVS.DE) is 6.00%, while AXA IM MSCI Emerging Markets ex-China Equity PAB UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Accumulating (AXQE.DE) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that QDVS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXQE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVS.DEAXQE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

9.35%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

30.41%

-16.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

32.57%

-15.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

30.53%

-13.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

30.53%

-11.85%

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AXQE.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVS.DE vs. AXQE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVS.DE nor AXQE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVS.DE and AXQE.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for AXQE.DE.

QDVS.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while AXQE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Climate Paris Aligned (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QDVS.DE and 0.30% for AXQE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVS.DE and AXQE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer