QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE
QDVH.DE (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVH.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials, while AMEA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVH.DE returned 12.64%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for AMEA.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVH.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEA.DE.
Performance
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVH.DE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMEA.DE's 23.16% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVH.DE has outperformed AMEA.DE with an annualized return of 12.64%, while AMEA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- 10.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.52%
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -9.94%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 5.35% | 2.98% | 37.18% | 8.42% | -6.23% | 48.61% | -12.31% | 35.60% | -10.80% | 7.95% |
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 23.16% | 18.02% | 18.95% | 3.13% | -15.22% | 1.46% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVH.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDVH.DE and AMEA.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVH.DE
AMEA.DE
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVH.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.83 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 9.19 | -7.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVH.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, which is greater than AMEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVH.DE and AMEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVH.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -35.43% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -13.20% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.74% | -20.46% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -27.47% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | -33.29% | -9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -11.86% | +11.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -10.78% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 4.07% | +1.53% |
Volatility
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) is 3.69%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that QDVH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVH.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 10.01% | -6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 19.59% | -9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 22.25% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 18.90% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 19.20% | +2.47% |
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVH.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVH.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVH.DE nor AMEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVH.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
QDVH.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while AMEA.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. QDVH.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVH.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVH.DE and AMEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer