QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDG3.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care while XDG3.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDVG.DE returned 3.69%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for XDG3.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDG3.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than XDG3.DE's -6.02% return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
XDG3.DE
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | 1.12% |
XDG3.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C | -6.02% | 1.47% | 9.58% | 2.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and XDG3.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QDVG.DE and XDG3.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
XDG3.DE
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.17 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 0.44 | +2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.16 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.16 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than XDG3.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and XDG3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -20.49% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -13.31% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -20.49% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -11.91% | +4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -5.57% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 5.29% | -0.88% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 3 Good Health UCITS ETF 1C (XDG3.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that QDVG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDG3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | XDG3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 4.95% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 10.56% | -0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 14.57% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 13.31% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 13.31% | +2.46% |
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDG3.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. XDG3.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor XDG3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and XDG3.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while XDG3.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being Select. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.35% for XDG3.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and XDG3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer