QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE
QDVG.DE (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and 2B78.DE (iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from iShares - QDVG.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care while 2B78.DE tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Breakthrough Healthcare. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVG.DE returned 6.75%/yr vs -1.74%/yr for 2B78.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVG.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 2B78.DE.
Performance
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVG.DE achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly higher than 2B78.DE's -2.07% return.
QDVG.DE
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
2B78.DE
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -2.95%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVG.DE iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.02% | 1.65% | 8.47% | -1.74% | 3.30% | 37.81% | 1.69% | 24.75% | 8.90% | 7.28% |
2B78.DE iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF | -2.07% | 5.50% | 7.24% | -0.29% | -19.03% | 1.15% | 38.75% | 16.74% | 0.39% | 19.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVG.DE and 2B78.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between QDVG.DE and 2B78.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVG.DE
2B78.DE
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVG.DE | 2B78.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.96 | 3.07 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVG.DE | 2B78.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.10 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.31 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVG.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum 2B78.DE drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVG.DE and 2B78.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVG.DE | 2B78.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -38.58% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -12.05% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -25.32% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -36.99% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -19.03% | +11.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -14.36% | +9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 4.86% | -0.45% |
Volatility
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE) at 3.74%. This indicates that QDVG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B78.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVG.DE | 2B78.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 3.74% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | 10.97% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 15.67% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 17.91% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 18.79% | -3.02% |
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVG.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B78.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVG.DE vs. 2B78.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVG.DE nor 2B78.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVG.DE and 2B78.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVG.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVG.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B78.DE.
QDVG.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care, while 2B78.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Breakthrough Healthcare. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVG.DE and 0.40% for 2B78.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVG.DE and 2B78.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer