2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE).
2B78.DE and IS3R.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2B78.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX® FactSet Breakthrough Healthcare. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. IS3R.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Momentum. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. Both 2B78.DE and IS3R.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 2B78.DE or IS3R.DE.
Key characteristics
| 2B78.DE | IS3R.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.86% | 21.31% |
| 1Y Return | -0.07% | 33.14% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.73% | 10.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.87% | 12.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.02 | 2.57 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.95% | 13.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.58% | -30.77% |
| Current Drawdown | -25.56% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B78.DE and IS3R.DE is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 2B78.DE achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than IS3R.DE's 21.31% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B78.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3R.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B78.DE nor IS3R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B78.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.58%, which is greater than IS3R.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B78.DE and IS3R.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
2B78.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF (2B78.DE) is 4.79%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that 2B78.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.