QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy while LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVF.DE returned 8.97%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for LOGS.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDVF.DE having a 32.71% return and LOGS.DE slightly lower at 31.31%. Over the past 10 years, QDVF.DE has underperformed LOGS.DE with an annualized return of 8.97%, while LOGS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 72.13% | 67.92% | -40.24% | 13.02% | -14.92% | -13.30% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 28.95% | 21.06% | -21.75% | 4.34% | 5.49% | 2.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and LOGS.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.72 |
The correlation between QDVF.DE and LOGS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
LOGS.DE
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVF.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.62 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 9.83 | -7.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 34.29 | -26.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVF.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 3.73 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.98 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.51 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.24 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than LOGS.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and LOGS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -56.42% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -6.50% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.13% | -21.16% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | -21.16% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.81% | -56.42% | -9.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -4.69% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -15.22% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 1.87% | +3.62% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) at 6.06%. This indicates that QDVF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | LOGS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 6.06% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 13.34% | +7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 17.18% | +6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 21.72% | +5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 24.09% | +4.59% |
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVF.DE nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVF.DE and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and LOGS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer