PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVF.DE has underperformed IQQH.DE with an annualized return of 8.97%, while IQQH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.


QDVF.DE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.38%
YTD
32.71%
6M
28.30%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
8.97%

IQQH.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
8.45%
YTD
39.28%
6M
35.95%
1Y
78.04%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
32.71%-2.67%9.20%-3.70%72.13%67.92%-40.24%13.02%-14.92%-13.30%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
39.28%29.83%-21.49%-22.15%0.84%-17.65%117.65%49.62%-4.26%7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVF.DE and IQQH.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.31

The correlation between QDVF.DE and IQQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVF.DE
QDVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVF.DEIQQH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

6.29

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.98

19.88

-11.90

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVF.DE and IQQH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVF.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

3.18

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.10

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.01

+0.29

Drawdowns

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and IQQH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVF.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-86.09%

+20.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.23%

-12.32%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.13%

-44.43%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.13%

-57.70%

+30.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.81%

-63.78%

-2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.92%

-24.01%

+15.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-59.78%

+42.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

3.90%

+1.59%

Volatility

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) is 7.70%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that QDVF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVF.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

9.79%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

18.31%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

24.37%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

24.69%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.68%

25.08%

+3.60%

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVF.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison

QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.94%1.53%1.32%1.23%0.83%1.23%0.56%2.89%3.30%4.82%4.72%2.86%
QDVF.DE
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVF.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and IQQH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer