QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE
QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) and D6RD.DE (Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy while D6RD.DE tracks the Solactive Future Energy ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QDVF.DE returned 13.74%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for D6RD.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for D6RD.DE.
Performance
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVF.DE achieves a 32.71% return, which is significantly lower than D6RD.DE's 48.10% return.
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 28.30%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
D6RD.DE
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 15.49%
- YTD
- 48.10%
- 6M
- 51.22%
- 1Y
- 98.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -3.70% | 25.75% |
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF | 48.10% | 24.03% | -13.45% | -18.15% | -5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVF.DE and D6RD.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between QDVF.DE and D6RD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVF.DE
D6RD.DE
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) and Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVF.DE | D6RD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.58 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 11.04 | -8.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 39.49 | -31.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVF.DE | D6RD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 3.82 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.20 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than D6RD.DE's maximum drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVF.DE and D6RD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVF.DE | D6RD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -59.57% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -8.91% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.13% | -45.73% | +18.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.92% | -2.87% | -6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -35.16% | +17.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 2.49% | +3.00% |
Volatility
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) is 7.70%, while Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that QDVF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVF.DE | D6RD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 10.63% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.43% | 18.24% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.05% | 25.71% | -1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 26.13% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 26.13% | +2.55% |
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RD.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVF.DE vs. D6RD.DE - Dividend Comparison
QDVF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D6RD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF | 0.34% | 0.59% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.08% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVF.DE and D6RD.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for D6RD.DE.
QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy, while D6RD.DE tracks Solactive Future Energy ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVF.DE and 0.55% for D6RD.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVF.DE and D6RD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer