D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE
D6RD.DE (Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF) and QCLN.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - D6RD.DE tracks the Solactive Future Energy ESG while QCLN.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, D6RD.DE returned 9.84%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for QCLN.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. D6RD.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.DE.
Performance
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with D6RD.DE having a 48.10% return and QCLN.DE slightly higher at 49.11%.
D6RD.DE
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 13.40%
- YTD
- 48.10%
- 6M
- 49.56%
- 1Y
- 100.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.22%
- YTD
- 49.11%
- 6M
- 44.27%
- 1Y
- 112.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF | 48.10% | 24.03% | -13.45% | -18.15% | -5.96% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 49.11% | 16.50% | -14.54% | -10.39% | -15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between D6RD.DE and QCLN.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between D6RD.DE and QCLN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
D6RD.DE
QCLN.DE
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| D6RD.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.44 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.04 | 7.93 | +3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.49 | 24.33 | +15.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| D6RD.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82 | 3.20 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.08 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum D6RD.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.57%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.DE drawdown of -69.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for D6RD.DE and QCLN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| D6RD.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.57% | -69.59% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -14.04% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.63% | -56.68% | +11.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -20.21% | +17.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.16% | -39.08% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 4.59% | -2.10% |
Volatility
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF (D6RD.DE) is 10.63%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that D6RD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| D6RD.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 14.59% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | 24.80% | -6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.71% | 34.84% | -9.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 36.29% | -10.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 36.76% | -10.63% |
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
D6RD.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
D6RD.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Dividend Comparison
D6RD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while QCLN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D6RD.DE Deka Future Energy ESG UCITS ETF | 0.34% | 0.59% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.08% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
D6RD.DE and QCLN.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, D6RD.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
D6RD.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
D6RD.DE tracks Solactive Future Energy ESG, while QCLN.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Deka and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for D6RD.DE and 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
Find the right allocation for D6RD.DE and QCLN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer