PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QDVE.DE having a 24.06% return and LYPG.DE slightly higher at 25.00%. Over the past 10 years, QDVE.DE has outperformed LYPG.DE with an annualized return of 26.04%, while LYPG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 23.74% annualized return.


QDVE.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
13.91%
YTD
24.06%
6M
23.05%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
25.33%
10Y*
26.04%

LYPG.DE

1D
-2.08%
1M
12.62%
YTD
25.00%
6M
23.20%
1Y
47.39%
3Y*
28.91%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
23.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
24.06%9.99%46.12%54.14%-25.83%46.77%29.69%53.86%3.04%21.00%
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
25.00%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVE.DE and LYPG.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.99

The correlation between QDVE.DE and LYPG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVE.DELYPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.09

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

8.18

+0.14

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVE.DE and LYPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVE.DELYPG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.35

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.97

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.19

1.10

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Drawdowns

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, roughly equal to the maximum LYPG.DE drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVE.DE and LYPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVE.DELYPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.45%

-31.83%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.59%

-15.58%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.83%

-29.64%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.83%

-29.64%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

-31.83%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-2.70%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-5.69%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

5.91%

0.00%

Volatility

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) and Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) have volatilities of 7.12% and 7.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVE.DELYPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.12%

7.17%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

15.06%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

20.52%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

22.56%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

21.45%

+0.28%

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVE.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LYPG.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVE.DE vs. LYPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVE.DE nor LYPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, QDVE.DE and LYPG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index, while LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QDVE.DE and 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVE.DE and LYPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer