QDVBX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
QDVBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Performance
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | -0.00% | 7.64% | 1.62% | 6.37% | -14.31% | -0.37% | 6.70% | -0.10% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -11.46% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 2.41% |
Returns By Period
QDVBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
TRLGX
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVBX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QDVBX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank
QDVBX
TRLGX
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVBX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 0.59 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 1.02 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 0.55 | +1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 1.83 | +3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVBX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 0.59 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.43 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.55 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVBX and TRLGX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
QDVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than TRLGX's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.51% | 3.51% | 3.52% | 3.66% | 2.56% | 1.70% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 15.46% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVBX drawdown since its inception was -19.86%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVBX and TRLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVBX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.86% | -55.56% | +35.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | -18.18% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.86% | -40.44% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -14.94% | +12.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -8.71% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 5.43% | -4.52% |
Volatility
QDVBX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fisher Investments Institutional Group ESG Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDVBX) is 1.41%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that QDVBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDVBX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 7.19% | -5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 12.51% | -9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 22.17% | -17.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 22.41% | -15.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.29% | 21.73% | -15.44% |