PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVB.DE achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.


QDVB.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
5.60%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.96%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
8.32%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.54%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QDVB.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF
9.84%0.36%29.35%26.56%-16.50%39.05%5.36%37.25%-12.66%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
17.82%18.16%24.07%52.10%-36.29%27.37%45.23%35.67%-15.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVB.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018

0.77

The correlation between QDVB.DE and NQSE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVB.DE
QDVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVB.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.08

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

10.77

-0.44

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVB.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVB.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.28

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.71

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.82

+0.01

Drawdowns

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVB.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVB.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-37.67%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-11.87%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-22.40%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-37.67%

+15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.84%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-8.56%

+3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.40%

-1.49%

Volatility

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) is 2.46%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that QDVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVB.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

4.75%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

11.99%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

16.05%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

20.91%

-5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

21.54%

-5.10%

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVB.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVB.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVB.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVB.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVB.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

QDVB.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. QDVB.DE tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVB.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVB.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer