QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE
QDVB.DE (iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVB.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality, while EUNN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDVB.DE returned 12.96%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for EUNN.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVB.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUNN.DE.
Performance
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVB.DE achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 16.53% return.
QDVB.DE
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 19.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVB.DE iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF | 9.84% | 0.36% | 29.35% | 26.56% | -16.50% | 39.05% | 5.36% | 37.25% | -2.65% | 7.18% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 13.46% | 12.90% | 15.16% | -11.47% | 9.25% | 4.10% | 22.24% | -10.32% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVB.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between QDVB.DE and EUNN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QDVB.DE
EUNN.DE
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.14 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.33 | 10.51 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.67 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.61 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.53 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than EUNN.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVB.DE and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.26% | -28.55% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | -9.58% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -15.81% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.66% | -19.41% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -6.85% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 2.86% | -0.95% |
Volatility
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) is 2.46%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that QDVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVB.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | 3.16% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 14.53% | -7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 17.97% | -6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 16.04% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 16.08% | +0.36% |
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVB.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDVB.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither QDVB.DE nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVB.DE and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDVB.DE.
QDVB.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. QDVB.DE tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVB.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.
Find the right allocation for QDVB.DE and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer