PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVA.DE achieves a 30.20% return, which is significantly higher than XDEM.DE's 22.76% return.


QDVA.DE

1D
-2.00%
1M
10.68%
YTD
30.20%
6M
29.85%
1Y
37.18%
3Y*
28.68%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*

XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
6.77%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.63%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVA.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
30.20%5.11%40.00%5.98%-13.66%22.93%17.39%31.13%1.12%20.30%
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.76%8.09%38.24%8.17%-13.85%25.04%16.52%31.63%0.79%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVA.DE and XDEM.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

0.94

The correlation between QDVA.DE and XDEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVA.DE
QDVA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVA.DEXDEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

3.47

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

13.27

-0.60

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVA.DE and XDEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVA.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.86

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.90

-0.06

Drawdowns

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than XDEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVA.DE and XDEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVA.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-30.93%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-9.05%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-23.51%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-23.51%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.95%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-5.97%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.36%

+0.55%

Volatility

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (QDVA.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) at 5.80%. This indicates that QDVA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVA.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

5.80%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

14.20%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

16.85%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

17.30%

+1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

17.85%

+1.34%

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVA.DE nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QDVA.DE and XDEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, QDVA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEM.DE.

QDVA.DE tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index, while XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVA.DE and 0.25% for XDEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVA.DE and XDEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer