PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTY vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTY vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 16.37% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.


QDTY

1D
0.06%
1M
9.62%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.71%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and SPY is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.86

The correlation between QDTY and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDTY vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDTY
SPY

Technology

53.7%
35.9%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.4%

Industrials

3.1%
7.8%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

QDTY
53.7%
SPY
35.9%

Communication Services

QDTY
15.8%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QDTY
12.2%
SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

QDTY
7.7%
SPY
4.8%

Healthcare

QDTY
4.2%
SPY
8.4%

Industrials

QDTY
3.1%
SPY
7.8%

Utilities

QDTY
1.4%
SPY
2.4%

Basic Materials

QDTY
1.1%
SPY
1.8%

Energy

QDTY
0.6%
SPY
3.6%

Financial Services

QDTY
0.2%
SPY
11.8%

Real Estate

QDTY
0.1%
SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTY vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY
QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTYSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

2.38

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

3.24

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.16

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.27

14.72

-1.45

QDTY vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTYSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.38

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.59

+0.27

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTYSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-55.19%

+31.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-8.88%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-9.05%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.91%

+1.11%

Volatility

QDTY vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that QDTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTYSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.84%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

8.90%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

11.83%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

17.05%

+8.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.87%

17.94%

+7.93%

QDTY vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTY vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.90%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDTY
YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
30.90%26.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTY and SPY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTY has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 39.98% vs 27.98% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 39.98% return vs 27.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

QDTY has the higher dividend yield at 30.90%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.

QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.09% for SPY.

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTY and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer