QDTY vs. PLTW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTY returned 31.52% vs -14.50% for PLTW. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

QDTY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTY achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -35.27% return.

QDTY

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 11.46%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: -35.27%
• 6M: -38.21%
• 1Y: -14.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	11.46%	10.77%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-35.27%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTY and PLTW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.51

The correlation between QDTY and PLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDTY vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDTY	PLTW
Technology	53.7%	20.0%
Communication Services	15.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	3.1%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QDTY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 65
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 64

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 8
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDTY	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	-0.24	+2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	0.07	+2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.01	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	-0.31	+3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.13	-0.55	+10.68

QDTY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDTY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTY drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTY and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTY	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-51.72%	+28.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.10%	-47.05%	+35.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.22%	-47.05%	+42.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-22.91%	+18.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	26.24%	-23.12%

Volatility

QDTY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is 6.75%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 20.76%. This indicates that QDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTY	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	20.76%	-14.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.16%	46.24%	-33.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.22%	60.77%	-44.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.06%	74.31%	-48.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.06%	74.31%	-48.25%

QDTY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

QDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.79%, less than PLTW's 139.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	139.00%	72.40%
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	31.79%	26.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTY and PLTW in my portfolio?

QDTY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTY or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to QDTY (6.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTY dropped -23.45% vs PLTW's -51.72%.

Which ETF is better, QDTY or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 31.52% vs -14.50% for PLTW. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDTY or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 31.52% return vs -14.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDTY or PLTW?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for QDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDTY or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 139.00%, compared with 31.79% for QDTY.

What is the main difference between QDTY and PLTW?

QDTY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PLTW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for QDTY and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.