PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Quadient SA (QDT.PA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDT.PA is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDT.PA achieves a -13.95% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.06% return.


QDT.PA

1D
0.65%
1M
7.60%
YTD
-13.95%
6M
-16.38%
1Y
-17.82%
3Y*
-8.74%
5Y*
-9.96%
10Y*
-1.34%

^GSPC

1D
0.00%
1M
4.16%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QDT.PA
Quadient SA
-13.95%-3.41%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.98%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QDT.PA and ^GSPC is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDT.PA
QDT.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QDT.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDT.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDT.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QDT.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDT.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadient SA (QDT.PA) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDT.PA^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDT.PA^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.98

-1.88

Drawdowns

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDT.PA drawdown since its inception was -80.56%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDT.PA and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDT.PA^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.56%

-7.57%

-72.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.20%

-0.20%

-71.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.56%

-1.39%

-38.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.38%

Volatility

QDT.PA vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDT.PA^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.49%

12.22%

+24.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.93%

12.22%

+19.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.70%

12.22%

+24.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDT.PA and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDT.PA and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer