PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDSIX vs. PQTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDSIX having a 6.42% return and PQTAX slightly lower at 6.24%.


QDSIX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.50%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.88%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*

PQTAX

1D
0.27%
1M
1.56%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.42%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
0.33%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
4.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
6.42%16.36%9.71%8.88%14.69%10.64%5.50%
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
6.24%2.06%-3.31%-4.52%11.06%14.52%4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between QDSIX and PQTAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.36

The correlation between QDSIX and PQTAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (5 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDSIX vs. PQTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDSIX
QDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PQTAX
PQTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PQTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PQTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDSIXPQTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.44

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

4.37

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.82

12.35

+10.47

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDSIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the PQTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDSIX and PQTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDSIXPQTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.40

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.47

0.35

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.45

+1.21

Drawdowns

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDSIX drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum PQTAX drawdown of -28.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDSIX and PQTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDSIXPQTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-28.39%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-4.66%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-18.94%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.06%

-28.39%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.22%

+12.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-9.37%

+7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

1.64%

-0.97%

Volatility

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) is 1.38%, while PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (PQTAX) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that QDSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDSIXPQTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.85%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.60%

6.60%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

8.49%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.64%

9.93%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.32%

9.44%

-2.12%

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDSIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PQTAX's 1.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDSIX vs. PQTAX - Dividend Comparison

QDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, while PQTAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PQTAX
PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%14.61%2.22%4.46%2.29%0.10%2.54%0.00%7.65%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
2.10%2.23%0.00%11.35%8.22%6.07%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDSIX and PQTAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQTAX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to QDSIX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDSIX dropped -7.06% vs PQTAX's -28.39%.

QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDSIX and PQTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer