QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L
QDIV.L (iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and VHYL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Dividend funds - QDIV.L tracks the MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index USD while VHYL.L tracks the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDIV.L returned 11.06%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for VHYL.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VHYL.L.
Performance
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QDIV.L is traded in USD, while VHYL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHYL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDIV.L having a 13.93% return and VHYL.L slightly lower at 13.26%. Over the past 10 years, QDIV.L has outperformed VHYL.L with an annualized return of 11.06%, while VHYL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.
QDIV.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
VHYL.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 26.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV.L iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 13.93% | 16.66% | 15.35% | 14.30% | -6.23% | 21.82% | 0.08% | 21.36% | -3.83% | 18.55% |
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 13.26% | 27.15% | 9.37% | 10.81% | -5.37% | 18.15% | -0.58% | 21.69% | -11.88% | 19.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV.L and VHYL.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between QDIV.L and VHYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV.L
VHYL.L
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDIV.L | VHYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.32 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.83 | 11.69 | +0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.39%, smaller than the maximum VHYL.L drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV.L and VHYL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV.L | VHYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.39% | -36.01% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.82% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -12.59% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.36% | -21.60% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.39% | -36.01% | +2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -0.28% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -5.28% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.22% | -0.18% |
Volatility
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) at 2.06%. This indicates that QDIV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV.L | VHYL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.06% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 8.34% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 10.24% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 13.19% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 14.40% | +0.68% |
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV.L vs. VHYL.L - Dividend Comparison
QDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than VHYL.L's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV.L iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.51% | 1.67% | 1.93% | 2.00% | 2.27% | 2.08% | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.44% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 2.47% |
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 2.53% | 2.79% | 3.08% | 3.37% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 3.28% | 3.34% | 3.63% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV.L and VHYL.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHYL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHYL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDIV.L.
QDIV.L tracks MSCI USA High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index USD, while VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QDIV.L and 0.29% for VHYL.L.
Find the right allocation for QDIV.L and VHYL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer