QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L
QDIV.L (iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DEMD.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV.L is a Dividend fund tracking the iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while DEMD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDIV.L returned 11.00%/yr vs 8.89%/yr for DEMD.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for DEMD.L.
Performance
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV.L achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly lower than DEMD.L's 15.99% return. Over the past 10 years, QDIV.L has outperformed DEMD.L with an annualized return of 11.00%, while DEMD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.89% annualized return.
QDIV.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
DEMD.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 1Y
- 21.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV.L iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 13.61% | 16.66% | 15.35% | 14.30% | -6.23% | 21.82% | 0.08% | 21.36% | -3.83% | 18.55% |
DEMD.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 15.99% | 20.91% | 5.26% | 21.17% | -12.75% | 13.36% | -6.14% | 18.40% | -7.50% | 25.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV.L and DEMD.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QDIV.L and DEMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV.L
DEMD.L
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDIV.L | DEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.75 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.18 | 8.20 | +3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.39%, smaller than the maximum DEMD.L drawdown of -40.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV.L and DEMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV.L | DEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.39% | -40.46% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.99% | -7.63% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -14.59% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.36% | -27.69% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.39% | -37.40% | +4.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -4.33% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -10.04% | +6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.56% | -0.52% |
Volatility
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) is 2.94%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that QDIV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV.L | DEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 4.52% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.95% | 12.03% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 14.23% | -2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 15.05% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 16.67% | -1.59% |
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMD.L's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV.L vs. DEMD.L - Dividend Comparison
QDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than DEMD.L's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMD.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.70% | 4.42% | 7.88% | 6.68% | 7.48% | 4.20% | 4.51% | 4.13% | 4.39% | 1.98% | 1.68% | 4.75% |
QDIV.L iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.93% | 2.00% | 2.27% | 2.08% | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.44% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV.L and DEMD.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDIV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDIV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMD.L.
QDIV.L is categorized as Dividend, while DEMD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. QDIV.L tracks iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while DEMD.L tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QDIV.L and 0.46% for DEMD.L.
Find the right allocation for QDIV.L and DEMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer