PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDISX vs. JNRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fisher Investments Institutional Group Stock Fund for Retirement Plans (QDISX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDISX achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than JNRFX's 9.24% return.


QDISX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.31%
YTD
11.25%
6M
14.30%
1Y
34.70%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*

JNRFX

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.60%
YTD
9.24%
6M
8.78%
1Y
25.42%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
14.89%
10Y*
16.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QDISX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Stock Fund for Retirement Plans
11.25%25.34%22.02%36.03%-24.15%20.28%27.76%1.00%
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund
9.24%18.45%35.13%43.14%-29.96%20.19%32.82%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QDISX and JNRFX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.91

The correlation between QDISX and JNRFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDISX vs. JNRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDISX
QDISX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QDISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDISX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QDISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

JNRFX
JNRFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JNRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JNRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Stock Fund for Retirement Plans (QDISX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDISXJNRFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.85

1.67

+1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.99

2.30

+1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.29

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

1.55

+1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.59

5.35

+9.24

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the JNRFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDISX and JNRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDISXJNRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.67

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.68

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.47

+0.33

Drawdowns

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDISX drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum JNRFX drawdown of -74.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDISX and JNRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDISXJNRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-74.74%

+40.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-17.05%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.27%

-22.66%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.97%

-36.48%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-24.96%

+17.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

4.94%

-2.53%

Volatility

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Volatility Comparison

Fisher Investments Institutional Group Stock Fund for Retirement Plans (QDISX) and Janus Henderson Research Fund (JNRFX) have volatilities of 3.77% and 3.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDISXJNRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

3.76%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

12.32%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

15.87%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.58%

22.03%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

21.33%

-0.17%

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDISX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JNRFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDISX vs. JNRFX - Dividend Comparison

QDISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.39%, more than JNRFX's 10.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNRFX
Janus Henderson Research Fund
10.93%11.94%5.11%2.93%0.43%13.01%2.98%10.37%11.06%8.22%5.41%9.21%
QDISX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Stock Fund for Retirement Plans
11.39%12.68%4.04%5.53%1.88%1.14%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDISX and JNRFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDISX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to JNRFX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDISX dropped -33.97% vs JNRFX's -74.74%.

QDISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDISX and JNRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer