PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDIBX vs. PREIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund (PREIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIBX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than PREIX's 11.61% return.


QDIBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*

PREIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.78%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.63%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
14.08%
10Y*
15.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
-0.11%7.72%1.66%6.71%-14.11%-0.17%6.77%-0.10%
PREIX
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund
11.61%17.66%24.78%26.07%-18.27%28.48%18.17%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIBX and PREIX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDIBX vs. PREIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDIBX
QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PREIX
PREIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PREIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PREIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PREIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PREIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PREIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund (PREIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDIBXPREIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.32

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

15.47

-10.54

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the PREIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIBX and PREIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDIBXPREIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.50

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.83

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.61

-0.45

Drawdowns

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIBX drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, smaller than the maximum PREIX drawdown of -55.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIBX and PREIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDIBXPREIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-55.32%

+35.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-8.93%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

-18.78%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.63%

-24.60%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

0.00%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-8.73%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.91%

-0.94%

Volatility

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) is 1.32%, while T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund (PREIX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that QDIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PREIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDIBXPREIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

2.83%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

8.98%

-6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

11.87%

-8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.59%

17.00%

-10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.26%

18.11%

-11.85%

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PREIX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDIBX vs. PREIX - Dividend Comparison

QDIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than PREIX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PREIX
T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund
2.10%2.32%1.17%1.32%1.50%1.56%1.97%2.13%2.60%1.30%2.03%2.02%
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
3.50%3.50%3.55%3.65%2.51%1.80%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDIBX and PREIX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PREIX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to QDIBX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIBX dropped -19.63% vs PREIX's -55.32%.

PREIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDIBX and PREIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer