QDIBX vs. PCGTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QDIBX (Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans) and PCGTX (PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, QDIBX returned 0.19%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for PCGTX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDIBX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PCGTX.

Performance

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIBX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 3.02% return.

QDIBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: -0.20%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 4.40%
• 5Y*: 0.19%
• 10Y*: —

PCGTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 4.98%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 1.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	-0.11%	7.72%	1.66%	6.71%	-14.11%	-0.17%	6.77%	-0.10%
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	3.02%	7.84%	0.98%	5.12%	-13.48%	-0.61%	5.75%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIBX and PCGTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019	0.84

The correlation between QDIBX and PCGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QDIBX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDIBX

QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 19
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

PCGTX

PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 55
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.81	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.16	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.40	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	3.33	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.93	11.48	-6.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIBX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	1.81	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.05	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.96	-0.80

Drawdowns

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIBX drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIBX and PCGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.63%	-19.34%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.97%	-3.09%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.37%	-7.94%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.63%	-19.20%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-1.31%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.39%	-1.85%	-4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.92%	+0.05%

Volatility

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) is 1.32%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that QDIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDIBX	PCGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	1.85%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	4.40%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	5.67%	-1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.59%	7.16%	-0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.26%	5.39%	+0.87%

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDIBX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

QDIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than PCGTX's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments	4.48%	3.78%	5.36%	5.02%	3.67%	2.87%	3.23%	3.53%	3.34%	2.96%	2.71%	2.21%
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans	3.50%	3.50%	3.55%	3.65%	2.51%	1.80%	3.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDIBX and PCGTX in my portfolio?

QDIBX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDIBX or PCGTX?

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to QDIBX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIBX dropped -19.63% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.