PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCRLX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCRLX achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.13% return. Over the past 10 years, NCRLX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 1.55%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.38% annualized return.


NCRLX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.48%
6M
-1.21%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
1.55%
ALL TIME*
2.16%

PCGTX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.77%
6M
1.76%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.38%
ALL TIME*
3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
-0.84%7.24%1.90%5.69%-14.36%-1.07%9.50%9.43%-1.06%3.95%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
2.13%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NCRLX and PCGTX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 1995

0.82

The correlation between NCRLX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCRLX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NCRLX
NCRLX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NCRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NCRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCRLXPCGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

2.36

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.34

6.55

-4.20

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCRLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCRLX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCRLX drawdown since its inception was -19.21%, roughly equal to the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCRLX and PCGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCRLXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-19.34%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-3.09%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-6.80%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-19.20%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.21%

-19.34%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-2.16%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-1.85%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.09%

+0.13%

Volatility

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund (NCRLX) is 1.06%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that NCRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCRLXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.40%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

4.71%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

5.63%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

7.21%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

5.42%

-0.41%

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCRLX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

NCRLX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

NCRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than PCGTX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NCRLX
Neuberger Berman Core Bond Fund
4.36%4.68%4.76%3.90%2.63%2.47%4.76%3.37%3.00%2.80%3.37%3.15%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.22%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


NCRLX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to NCRLX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCRLX dropped -19.21% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NCRLX and PCGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer